When the rules don’t match reality. Does this lead to complacency?

IMHO – Modern day cars don’t achieve sticker promised fuel efficiency promises in real life on real roads anymore.
If they did, there would be less general commentary in the motoring press on the gap between sticker and real life and I would not have experienced this personally in a variety of cars from a multiple manufacturers.
Testing regimes therefore seem to be flawed as they  don’t achieve their core promise which is to simulate real world driving conditions on behalf of the consumer. 
Therefore, the degree to which this VW and BMW thing “exceeds” “regulations” should be kept in perspective given we all “know” that the numbers are nowadays “wrong” as evidenced by our inability to ever achieve the promises of the new car fuel efficiency sticker.

– question: what does it mean for an organisation if they choose to allow themselves to adhere to “rules” that dont match reality?

– question: what does it say about a regulatory authority when it knows thats its core processes and deliverables are broken even though its cause is noble?

– question: what regulatory environment are the market participants actually operating in? The formal or informal?

– CP: follow the cash back to who benefits from this mess
– #vanitymetrics
Lots of articles on this item. Example http://flip.it/VxGg4 

3d printed car in it for the X Prize

The Urbee 2 is a car that has been printed via 3d technology. This Popular Mechanics article shares some information on the Urbee and 3D printers ability to print carbon fibre.

Impact will be on car body panels as spare parts. In Australia, manufacturers have great logistics systems to express spare parts around the country. The logistics cost is huge per unit.

What if the Geelong crash repair centre can print that bumper for the MY13 Corolla instead of getting it shipped from Sydney overnight?

Link to Popular Mechanics article

 

Opportunity to decrease Australian consumer goods prices by decreasing transport costs

Things are getting interesting now that 3D printing is firmly on the radar.
Australia is a long way by sea or air for imported goods that arrive via transportation methods that cost time and fuel.
The cost to internally distribute goods throughout Australia is also high given our relatively small population and vast distances.
Import/Export and internal distribution costs are a significant cost component of our everyday items.
In a world where clothing, spare parts and potentially cars prices are potentially able to be manufactured by a suitable variation of a 3D printer, importers, wholesale and retail will all be touched in someway by 3D printing and its impact on distribution costs.
I found the article below interesting and thought you might as well.

http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/perspectives/2015-commercial-transportation-trends